Molecular Evaluation of Concomitant HBsAg, and Anti-HBs Positivity in Chronic Hepatitis B Patients
PDF
Cite
Share
Request
Research Article
VOLUME: 32 ISSUE: 1
P: 19 - 25
April 2026

Molecular Evaluation of Concomitant HBsAg, and Anti-HBs Positivity in Chronic Hepatitis B Patients

Viral Hepat J 2026;32(1):19-25
1. Hitit University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Çorum, Türkiye
2. Kocaeli University Research and Application Hospital, PCR Unit, Kocaeli, Türkiye
3. Near East University, DESAM Research Institute, Nicosia, Cyprus
4. Hitit University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Clinical Microbiology, Çorum, Türkiye
No information available.
No information available
Received Date: 27.01.2026
Accepted Date: 11.05.2026
Online Date: 01.06.2026
Publish Date: 01.06.2026
PDF
Cite
Share
Request

ABSTRACT

Objectives

The hepatitis B virus (HBV) has a high mutation rate during replication, leading to the production of different variants. However, such atypical profiles could also be due to variant strains resulting from mutations. This study aimed to determine the mutations responsible for this profile and the presence of mutant strains by performing sequence analysis of the HBV pol/S gene regions in patients with chronic HB infection who were found to have coexisting HB surface antigen (HBsAg) and anti-HBs positivity during their follow-up.

Materials and Methods

The study group consisted of patients who were found to be simultaneously positive for HBsAg and anti-HBs during routine follow-up for chronic HBV infection between 2021 and 2022. Mutations in the pol/S gene regions of HBV-DNA- positive patients were investigated using HBV-DNA sequencing technology.

Results

The coexistence of HBsAg and anti-HBs was observed in 33 patients (3.8%). Anti-HBe was positive in all cases. Thirteen (39.4%) patients were HBV-DNA positive (minimum 6.9+E1 IU, maximum 3.7+E6 IU). All patients had HBV genotype D, and the D1/D2 ratio was 45.5%/54.6%. Among HBV-DNA-positive patients, 11 (84.6%) had pol/S gene mutations. Sixty-eight HBsAg mutations (42.8%) and 91 reverse transcriptase (RT) mutations (57%) were detected in these cases, representing a total of 159 mutations. In total, three patients (27.2%) had clinically significant HBsAg mutations, and four (36.3%) had RT mutations. Drug resistance was detected in 18.2% of cases. A vaccine-escape HBsAg mutation was detected in two cases (18.1%).

Conclusion

The mutations detected in the pol/S gene sequence analyses of patients with HBsAg and anti-HBs coexistence seen in the course of chronic HB infection are naturally occurring, and the coexistence of HBsAg and anti-HBs could not be explained by these mutations.

Keywords:
HBsAg, anti-HBs, chronic hepatitis B, coexistence, mutation

Introduction

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) is a double-stranded DNA virus belonging to the family Hepadnaviridae and is part of the Orthohepadnavirus group. It has 10 different genotypes (A-J) and several subgenotype (1, 2). Among the polymorphism patterns of genotype D, the model types D1, D2, and D6 were commonly observed. Genotypes influence the natural history and clinical outcomes of HBV and response to treatment in chronic patients (3, 4, 5). Chronic HB (CHB), characterized by HB surface antigen (HBsAg) positivity for more than six months, has emerged as a major public health problem worldwide (1). The most common genotype in Türkiye is genotype D (3, 6, 7, 8).

The S region of HBV-DNA comprises the S gene and pre-S gene regions. This gene region encodes three envelope proteins of the HBsAg: small (S protein), medium (M protein), and large (L protein). Differences in these proteins are caused by synthesis starting from different codons within on the same gene (9). Serological and molecular tests, including HBsAg and anti-HBs antibodies, are used for the diagnosis and follow-up of HB infection. Although HBsAg is a marker of HBV infection, anti-HBs is a marker of immunity to HBV infection. Anti-HBs generally appear after the loss of HBsAg. Simultaneous HBsAg and anti-HBs positivity is not an expected condition (10). The mechanisms leading to simultaneous HBsAg and anti-HBs antibody positivity remain controversial. This atypical serological profile may result from laboratory error or be caused by viral and host-related factors (11).

Although the HBV is a DNA virus, it has a high replication capacity (>1012 virion/day). Because the viral polymerase enzyme lacks proofreading activity during the reverse transcription process, it is susceptible to mutation during replication and has a high mutation frequency (105 substitutions/base/cycle) (6). These mutations result in a large number of variants. Although most mutations are single nucleotide substitutions, they can sometimes occur as deletions or insertions. The coexistence of HBsAg and anti-HBs can be caused by mutant HBV strains escaping the immune system, point mutations occurring in the S gene, and rarely, pre-S and S gene deletion mutations, particularly mutations in the determinant “a” or polymerase region (12, 13, 14, 15, 16).

The aim of this study was to determine the presence of mutant strains by sequencing HBV gene regions and performing pol/S gene mutation analysis in patients with concurrent HBsAg and anti-HBs positivity who were followed up for CHB infection.

Materials and Methods

Between 2021 and 2022, patients aged >18 years who were diagnosed with CHB and followed up in the department of infectious diseases and clinical microbiology, and who simultaneously tested positive for both HBsAg and anti-HBs by ELISA (ARCHITECT HBsAg Qualitative II Reagent Kit, ARCHITECT Anti-HBs Qualitative II Reagent Kit, and ARCHITECT i2000SR Immunoassay Analyzer) were included in the study. Patients who did not simultaneously test positive for both HBsAg and anti-HBs or who had decompensated cirrhosis, delta virus, hepatitis C, or human immunodeficiency virus infection were excluded from the study. Mutation analysis was performed on serum samples from HBV-DNA positive patients, and the pol gene was amplified and sequenced. This is shown in the flowchart (Figure 1).

Written informed consent was obtained from all patients who agreed to participate in this study. Age, gender, HBsAg, anti-HBs, HBeAg, anti-HBe levels, HBV-DNA load, and current treatments were recorded. A 10-mL whole-blood sample was obtained from each patient. The separated sera were stored at -20 oC until the time of the study.

HBV-DNA Quantitation

A QIAsymphony SP magnetic particle isolation platform (QIAGEN GmbH, Hilden, Germany) was used to isolate HBV-DNA. HBV-DNA was quantified by real-time polymerase chain reaction using an artus HBV-DNA RGQ kit on the RotorGene platform (QIAGEN GmbH, Hilden, Germany).

HBV Genotyping and Resistance Analysis

HBV genotyping was performed by sequencing all known primary/compensatory nucleos(t)ide analogs, resistance mutations, and mutations of the S gene (HBsAg protein; amino acids 111-227) that overlap with the reverse transcriptase (RT) domain (RT region, amino acids 80-250) (17). Forward (F: 5’-TCGTGGTGGACTTCTCTCAATT-3’) and reverse (R: 5’-CGTTGACAGACTTTCCAATCAAT-3’) primers were used to amplify the HBV pol gene (742 bp). Phire Hot Start DNA polymerase (Finnzymes Oy, Finland) was used in the sequencing protocol. Sequencing was performed using the BigDye Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech Inc., USA) according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. Sequencing was performed using the ABI PRISM 3130 platform (Applied Biosystems Inc., USA). Vector NTI v5.1 software (InforMax, Invitrogen, Life Science Software, USA) was used to generate electropherograms. Sequences were analyzed using the Geno2pheno Drug Resistance software (Center of Advanced European Studies and Research, Germany).

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS (version 26.0) software package. Descriptive statistics were presented as mean ± standard deviation for normally distributed continuous data, median (minimum-maximum) for continuous variables with non-normal distribution, and numbers (n) and percentage (%) for categorical data.

Ethics Committee Approval

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine, Hitit University (date: 28.04.2021, approval no: 457). This study was supported by the Scientific Research Project Unit of Hitit University (project number: TIP19001.21.004).

Results

A total of 864 patients diagnosed with CHB were followed up at the department of infectious diseases and clinical microbiology between 2021 and 2022. Of these, 33 patients (3.8%) with concurrent HBsAg and anti-HBs positivity were included in the study. Anti-HBe positivity was found in all cases (100%). HBV-DNA positivity was detected in 13 patients (39.4%). Among HBV-DNA-positive patients, 76.9% were male, and the mean age was 54.9 years. HBV-DNA results were negative in 20 of 33 (60.6%) patients with concurrent HBsAg and anti-HBs positivity (non-replicative) (Table 1).

The median anti-HBs titers were 51.4 mIU/mL in HBV-DNA-negative cases, 17.6 mIU/mL in HBV-DNA-positive cases, and 38.7 mIU/mL overall. Anti-HBs antibodies in HBV-DNA positive patients ranged from 11.1 to 25.9 mIU/mL (Table 1).

All HBV-DNA-positive had HBV genotype D (100%). An analysis of their sub-genotype showed that the D/D1 and D/D2 ratios were 45.5% and 54.6, respectively. Mutational analysis was performed on serum samples from 13 HBV-DNA-positive patients (3.8%) and the pol gene was amplified and sequenced. Codon analyses of the RT domain (polymerase/pol mutation) and of the HBsAg protein (S gene) were performed in all patients. In two of the 13 (15.4%) HBV-DNA-positive patients (P3, P7), sequence-based mutation analysis of the pol/S gene was not performed. Pol/S gene mutations were detected in 11 (84.6%) of the 13 patients. In these patients, 68 HBsAg mutations (42.8%) and 91 RT mutations (57.2%) were identified, resulting in a total of 159 mutations. While three patients (27.2%) were found to have a clinically significant HBsAg mutation, four patients (36.3%) were found to have an RT mutation. Three patients were found to have anti-HBs levels above 20 mIU/mL, and no pol/S gene mutation was detected in two of them. The mean HBV-DNA level was 2.8+E5 IU/mL (range, 6.2+E1-3.7+E6) (Table 1). Only one patient was found to have clinically significant concurrent HBsAg and RT mutations, and this patient had the highest viral replication (HBV-DNA: 3.7+E6) (Table 2).

Two patients (15.4%) received antiviral therapy, whereas 11 patients (84.6%) did not receive treatment. While one HBV-DNA-positive patient received entecavir, another received tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (Table 1). Drug resistance to nucleoside/nucleotide analogs was observed in 18.2% (n=2) of patients. While one patient (P1) had primary resistance to entecavir, telbivudine, and lamivudine, another patient (P4) had primary resistance to telbivudine and lamivudine. The same patient was moderately susceptible to entecavir. None of the patients with resistance mutations received antiviral therapy. Two cases (18.18%) were found to have the HBsAg vaccine escape mutation (Table 2).

Discussion

In patients with CHB, the coexistence of HBsAg and anti-HBs may be detected during follow-up. Studies conducted in Turkey and other parts of the world have reported that the prevalence of serological profiles with simultaneous HBsAg and anti-HBs positivity ranges from 2.8% to 9% (10, 18, 19, 20). In our study, the coexistence of HBsAg and anti-HBs was observed in 3.8% of patients with CHB infection, which is consistent with the literature.

Although the underlying molecular mechanisms for the coexistence of HBsAg and anti-HBs in patients with CHB infection are not clear, it may be due to the selection of immune escape mutants of HBV during chronic process, and pre-S and S gene deletion mutations have been identified in such cases (9, 21, 22). Some studies have shown that this is usually caused by S gene point mutations, but it is rarely associated with pre-S and S gene mutations (18, 23). In our patients with HBsAg and anti-HBs positivity who were followed up with CHB, mutation analysis of pol/S genes by sequence analysis of HBV gene regions showed that a total of 159 mutations were observed, including sixty-eight HBsAg mutations (42.8%) and 91 RT mutations (57.2%); of these, a clinically significant HBsAg mutation was detected in three cases (27.27%) and an RT mutation in four cases (36.36%). The presence of these mutations is important in the context of treatment and immunosuppression.

When the relationship between the observed mutations and the HBV-DNA result was evaluated, a patient with a combination of clinically significant mutations in HBsAg and RT had the highest rate of viral replication (HBV-DNA: 3.7+E6). It has been reported that the pre-S/S and polymerase genes sometimes overlap during replication, and some codons may overlap. Increased HBV replication leading to a severe clinical course has been observed in HBV variants with combinations of HBsAg and RT mutation (18). This case was closely monitored clinically. Mutations were not analyzed in 60.6% of patients with negative HBV-DNA and in two patients with positive HBV-DNA (P3 and P7) because sequencing could not be performed. The presence of these mutations in individuals testing negative for HBV-DNA suggests they may originate from remnants of a previously formed viral variant or a low-level persistent mutant virus.

Analysis of the relationship between these mutations and genotype shows that pre-S/S mutations (HBsAg mutation) are more common in genotype D infection, which is associated with fulminant hepatitis (18). Despite this study, other studies have reported that genotype C has more mutations (16, 24). In our study, genotype D was found in all included patients, and no mixed isolates were observed. In patients with genotype D, fewer clinically significant HBsAg mutations (27.2%) were detected than RT mutations (36.3%). D2 was the dominant sub genotype in our cohort (54.6%). In Türkiye, genotype D is dominant, as in Southern Europe, the Middle East, and India. The sub-genotypes observed in Türkiye range from D1 to D4. D1 is the most common sub-genotype. Although HBeAg seroconversion is observed at lower rates in patients infected with genotype D (7, 25), all of our patients had HBeAg seroconversion. We must always consider the presence of these mutations when monitoring our patients.

Mutant HBV variants can also infect vaccinated individuals and are not neutralized by vaccine-derived anti-HB antibodies; these are known as vaccine escape mutations. The emergence and predominance of vaccine escape mutants may pose a serious threat to the control of HBV infection. Some common immune escape mutants are G145R, D144A, P142S, Q129H, I/T/126N/A and M133L (18, 24). A study in which genotypes D (81.3%) and E (17.3%) were dominant reported that vaccine escape mutations (P120T, D144E/A and G145R) were detected in genotype D isolates (19). All patients in our study were genotype D, and 18.2% had the S193L HBsAg mutation, a vaccine escape mutation. This mutation can occur with entecavir use (24), but it was not associated with drug use in our study because the patients were not receiving antiviral drugs. This mutation developed naturally. This suggests that HB infection can develop despite the presence of immunoglobulin.

Nucleoside analogs can induce point mutations in the pol gene. The formation of point mutations can lead to drug resistance (17). These mutations can be divided into two main groups: primary drug resistance mutations, which result in non-response to treatment, and compensatory mutations, which affect viral fitness (increased viral load and restored replication capacity). The W172L mutation in HBsAg caused by acyclic phosphonate has been frequently observed in patients receiving lamivudine (17, 26). In our study, two patients who developed drug resistance had no prior exposure to antiviral therapy. This situation suggests to us that it may be an infection caused by a resistant strain or it may have developed spontaneously through mutation. Close monitoring of these patients is important.

When the relationship between the observed mutations and the anti-HBs titers was evaluated, the anti-HBs levels of our patients ranged from 11.1 to 25.9 mIU/mL. The median anti-HBs titer was 51.4 in the HBV-DNA-negative group and 17.6 in the HBV-DNA-positive group. Anti-HBs titers were lower in the HBV-DNA- positive group. This interpretation may be supported by the increase in anti-HBs levels, which suggests a weak immune response. No mutation was detected in two of the three cases (P3, P7, P12) with anti-HBs levels above 20 mIU/mL (P3 and P7). Thus, in proportion to the anti-HB titer, more amino acid mutations are observed in HBsAg and anti-HBs positive patients (27).

In our study no correlation was found between the number of mutations observed and the anti-HB titer. Given the small number of cases, this approach should be supported by studies with larger sample sizes.

Study Limitations

1. No patients under the age of 18.

2. The number of cases is small.

Conclusion

During the follow-up of patients with CHB, HBsAg and anti-HBs may be observed together. The mutations detected in the pol/S gene analyses of the HBV genomes of these patients are not clinically significant; these mutations are naturally occurring, and the association of HBsAg and anti-HBs could not be explained by these mutations.

Ethics

Ethics Committee Approval: This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine, Hitit University (date: 28.04.2021, approval no: 457).
Informed Consent: Written informed consent was obtained from all patients who agreed to participate in this study.

Authorship Contributions

Concept: Ö.A., N.B., A.K.Ç., Design: Ö.A., M.S., N.B., A.K.Ç., Data Collection or Processing: Ö.A., D.Y., Ü.S., G.K., Analysis or Interpretation: Ö.A., M.S., Ü.S., N.B., A.K.Ç., Literature Search: Ö.A., D.Y., M.S., N.B., A.K.Ç., Writing: Ö.A., D.Y., M.S., N.B., A.K.Ç.
Conflict of Interest: No conflict of interest was declared by the authors.
Financial Disclosure: This study was supported by the Scientific Research Project Unit of Hitit University (project number: TIP19001.21.004).

References

1
World Health Organization. Global hepatitis report 2017. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017. Available from: https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/255016/9789241565455-eng.pdf
2
Elizalde MM, Tadey L, Mammana L, Quarleri JF, Campos RH, Flichman DM. Biological characterization of hepatitis B virus genotypes: their role in viral replication and antigen expression. Front Microbiol. 2021;12:758613.
3
Ozdemir FT, Duman D, Ertem D, Avşar E, Eren F, Ozdoğan O, Kalayci C, Aslan N, Bozdayi AM, Tözün N. Determination of hepatitis B genotypes in patients with chronic hepatitis B virus infection in Turkey. Turk J Gastroenterol. 2005;16:183-187.
4
Asan A, Sayan M, Akhan S, Koruk ST, Aygen B, Sirmatel F, Eraksoy H, Tuna N, Köse S, Kaya A, Tulek NE, Demir NA, Mistik R, Ormen B, Korkmaz F, Yildirmak T, Ural O, Aydin M, Turgut H, Gunal O, Demirturk N. Molecular characterization of drug resistance in hepatitis B viruses isolated from patients with chronic infection in Turkey. 2018;18:e12472.
5
Sarıgül Yıldırım F, Sayan M. Implications of hepatitis B and C on the human immunodeficiency virus infections. Viral Hepat J. 2022;28:72-78.
6
Demirtürk N, Köse A, Ural O, Asan A, Barut S, Sumer S, Simsek F, Turker N. [Management of chronic hepatitis B infection: a consensus report of the Study Group for Viral Hepatitis of the Turkish Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases-2023 Update]. Klimik Derg. 2023;36(Suppl. 1):1-22. Turkish.
7
Cakal B, Atasoy A, Cavus B, Ormeci A, Poda M, Bulakci M, Gulluoglu M, Gunver MG, Akyuz F. Analysis of genotype, subgenotype and serotype of occult hepatitis B virus. J Istanbul Fac Med. 2021;84:402-411.
8
Arıkan A, Şanlıdağ T, Süer K, Sayan M, Akçalı S, Güler E. Molecular epidemiology of hepatitis B virus in Northern Cyprus. Mikrobiyol Bul. 2016;50:86-93.
9
Yamamoto K, Horikita M, Tsuda F, Itoh K, Akahane Y, Yotsumoto S, Okamoto H, Miyakawa Y, Mayumi M. Naturally occurring escape mutants of hepatitis B virus with various mutations in the S gene in carriers seropositive for antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen. J Virol. 1994;68:2671-2676.
10
Aydın N, Kırdar S, Uzun N, Eyigör M, Sayan M. Hepatit B enfeksiyonunda atipik serolojik profiller: HBsAg ve Anti-HBs birlikte pozitif olgularda S geni mutasyonlarının araştırılması. Mikrobiyol Bul. 2016;50:535-543.
11
Liang TJ. Hepatitis B: the virus and disease. Hepatology. 2009;49(5 Suppl):S13-S21.
12
Karataş E, Erensoy S, Akarca US, Sertöz R. Hepatit B virüsü (HBV) genotip D ile enfekte hasta gruplarında HBV preS1, preS2 ve S gen bölgelerinin analizi [Analysis of hepatitis B virus (HBV) preS1, preS2 and S gene regions from patient groups infected with HBV genotype D]. Mikrobiyol Bul. 2018;52:23-34. Turkish.
13
Fu X, Chen J, Chen H, Lin J, Xun Z, Li S, Liu C, Zeng Y, Chen T, Yang B, Ou Q. Mutation in the S gene of hepatitis B virus and anti-HBs subtype-nonspecificity contributed to the co-existence of HBsAg and anti-HBs in patients with chronic hepatitis B virus infection. J Med Virol. 2017;89:1419-1426.
14
Wang S, Wang J, Fan MJ, Li TY, Pan H, Wang X, Liu HK, Lin QF, Zhang JG, Guan LP, Zhernakova DV, O’Brien SJ, Feng ZR, Chang L, Dai EH, Lu JH, Xi HL, Zeng Z, Yu YY, Wang BB. Identified OAS3 gene variants associated with coexistence of HBsAg and anti-HBs in chronic HBV infection. J Viral Hepat. 2018;25:904-910.
15
Huang X, Qin Y, Zhang P, Tang G, Shi Q, Xu J, Qi F, Shen Q. PreS deletion mutations of hepatitis B virus in chronically infected patients with simultaneous seropositivity for hepatitis-B surface antigen and anti-HBS antibodies. J Med Virol. 2010;82:23-31.
16
Jiang X, Chang L, Yan Y, Wang L. Paradoxical HBsAg and anti-HBs coexistence among chronic HBV infections: causes and consequences. Int J Biol Sci. 2021;17:1125-1137.
17
Sayan M, Sentürk O, Akhan SÇ, Hülagü S, Cekmen MB. Monitoring of hepatitis B virus surface antigen escape mutations and concomitantly nucleos(t)ide analog resistance mutations in Turkish patients with chronic hepatitis B. Int J Infect Dis. 2010;14 Suppl 3:e136-e141.
18
Lada O, Benhamou Y, Poynard T, Thibault V. Coexistence of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBs Ag) and anti-HBs antibodies in chronic hepatitis B virus carriers: influence of “a” determinant variants. J Virol. 2006;80:2968-2975.
19
de Campos Albuquerque I, Sousa MT, Santos MD, Nunes JD, Moraes MJ, Gomes-Gouvêa MS, Pinho JR, Carrilho FJ, Fonseca LM, de Sousa Paiva Ferreira A. Mutation in the S gene a determinant of the hepatitis B virus associated with concomitant HBsAg and anti-HBs in a population in Northeastern Brazil. J Med Virol. 2017;89:458-462.
20
Zhu D, Chen W, Xu C, Yu X, Xi Y. Virology and serological characteristics of chronic hepatitis B patients with the co-existence of HBsAg and anti-HBs antibodies. Clin Lab. 2020;66.
21
Sugauchi F, Ohno T, Orito E, Sakugawa H, Ichida T, Komatsu M, Kuramitsu T, Ueda R, Miyakawa Y, Mizokami M. Influence of hepatitis B virus genotypes on the development of preS deletions and advanced liver disease. J Med Virol. 2003;70:537-544.
22
Fan YF, Lu CC, Chen WC, Yao WJ, Wang HC, Chang TT, Lei HY, Shiau AL, Su IJ. Prevalence and significance of hepatitis B virus (HBV) pre-S mutants in serum and liver at different replicative stages of chronic HBV infection. Hepatology. 2001;33:277-286.
23
Kajiwara E, Tanaka Y, Ohashi T, Uchimura K, Sadoshima S, Kinjo M, Mizokami M. Hepatitis B caused by a hepatitis B surface antigen escape mutant. J Gastroenterol. 2008;43:243-247.
24
Xue Y, Wang MJ, Yang ZT, Yu DM, Han Y, Huang D, Zhang DH, Zhang XX. Clinical features and viral quasispecies characteristics associated with infection by the hepatitis B virus G145R immune escape mutant. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2017;6:e15.
25
Terrault NA, Lok ASF, McMahon BJ, Chang KM, Hwang JP, Jonas MM, Brown RS Jr, Bzowej NH, Wong JB. Update on prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of chronic hepatitis B: AASLD 2018 hepatitis B guidance. Hepatology. 2018;67:1560-1599.
26
Lu HY, Zeng Z, Xu XY, Zhang NL, Yu M, Gong WB. Mutations in surface and polymerase gene of chronic hepatitis B patients with coexisting HBsAg and anti-HBs. World J Gastroenterol. 2006;12:4219-4223.
27
Yatsuji H, Noguchi C, Hiraga N, Mori N, Tsuge M, Imamura M, Takahashi S, Iwao E, Fujimoto Y, Ochi H, Abe H, Maekawa T, Tateno C, Yoshizato K, Suzuki F, Kumada H, Chayama K. Emergence of a novel lamivudine-resistant hepatitis B virus variant with a substitution outside the YMDD motif. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2006;50:3867-3874.