ABSTRACT

Conclusion:

The study group consisted of patients with pregnancy complications and HBsAg positivity was found to be 2.1%. A lower rate was found compared to other regions. Studies to be conducted in different endemic regions of Hepatitis B in our country will illuminate the effect of hepatitis B on pregnancy better.

Results:

HBsAg was positive in 255 (2.1%) patients. Two groups compared in terms of age and there was no significant difference (p=0.45). Two groups compared in terms of pregnancy outcomes and there was no significant difference (p=0.1).

Materials and Methods:

The study group consisted of patients followed up in the obstetrics service. Pregnancy-related discharge codes were queried approximately 2017-2019. Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) levels in serum samples were studied by chemiluminescence enzyme immunoassay method (Architect, Abbott Laboratories, USA). The HBsAg-positive group and HBsAg-negative group data were analyzed using SPSS version 22 (SPSS Inc.; Chicago, IL, USA).

Objectives:

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) is a major global public health problem. Maternal-fetal transmission of viral hepatitis may contribute to pregnancy-related complications. This study aimed to evaluate the frequency of HBV and its possible adverse pregnancy outcomes.

Keywords:

Hepatitis B, pregnancy complications, HBsAg seropositivity

Intoduction

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) is major global public health problem worldwide that lead to chronic hepatitis, cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (1). More than 2 billion people live with HBV and 248 million of these are chronically infected (2). Turkey is on the whole considered to have a intermediate HBV endemicity. Between the years 2008-2011 comprehensive study was done by Liver Research Association of Turkey. Seropositivity rate for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) determined 4% (3).

There are three possible HBV transmission ways from infected mother to infant: First transplacental transmission, the second is perinatal transmission during childbirth, the third is postnatal tranmission during care and breastfeeding (4). To prevent transmission, HBV screening is part of routine prenatal care in Turkey. Hepatitis B immunoglobulin prophylaxis is given to infant born to mothers with HBsAg positive (5). HBsAg screening is recommended for all pregnant woman in local guideline (6).

In addition, maternal-fetal transmission of viral hepatitis may contribute to pregnancy-related complications such as gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), preterm birth (PTB), intrauterine growth restriction, pre-eclampsia, antepartum haemorrhage (7). The aim of this study was to evaluate the frequency of HBV and its possible adverse pregnancy outcomes.

Materials and Methods

This retrospective study was conducted at a Necmettin Erbakan University Hospital Ethics Committee (approval number: 2021-126; date: 19.02.2021). The present study did not require informed consent owing to its retrospective nature. The study population comprised pregnant women who attended the Meram Faculty of Medicine, Gynecology and Obstetrics Inpatient Clinic. Pregnancy-related disharge codes was queried between 2017-2019. HBsAg status of the patients examined. HBsAg positive patients identified. The medical records of the patients involved in the study were reviewed by gynecologist. Inclusion criteria consisted of absense of medical or surgical disease such as liver disease, pre-GDM and hypertension. HBsAg status was routinely screened. HBsAg levels in serum samples were tested by the chemiluminescence enzyme immunoassay method (Architect, Abbott Laboratories, USA). The HBsAg positive patients constituted case group. They were divided into four groups according to pregnancy complications. Abortion, pre-eclampsia, PTB/premature of membranes, abortion imminens, postpartum hemorrhage and GDM were included in the obstetric complication group; intrauterin growth restriction, fetal anomaly and macrosomia were inclueded in fetal complication group, oligohidramnios, hyperemesis gravidarum, polyhydramnios and ectopic pregnancy were inclueded in other, the last group consisted of normal patients with no complications or clinical findings. HBsAg negative patients who applied in the same period and had similar demographic characteristics with case group constituted control group.

Statistical Analysis

To compare HBsAg-negative patient (control group) data and HBsAg-positive patient (case group) data were analyzed using SPSS version 22 (SPSS Inc.; Chicago, IL, USA). Categorical variables were compared using the c² test. Continuous variables were expressed as means ± standard deviation and compared using the t-test. P<0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Results

In total, 11,941 pregnant patients data reviewed. HBsAg positivity was detected in 255 (2,1%) patients. Among these 115 women were excluded from the study because of medical complications or incomplete records. The case group included 140 patients (Figure 1). The control group included 287 patients. Two groups compared in terms of age and there was no significant difference (p=0.45). Two groups compared in terms of pregnancy outcomes and there was no significant difference (p=0.1). Obstetric complication constituted a significant part of pregnancy outcomes (42.1%) in the case group. In the control group, the majority of the patients (40.8%) were normal patients (Table 1).

Discussion

It is recommended to screen routinely pregnant patients for HBV infection by various international guidelines (8,9,10). Perinatal transmission from mother to infant is the most important cause of HBV infection, especially in regions with high prevalence, with a risk of chronicity over 90% (11). Since our country is located in the middle endemic region in terms of HBV infection, HBsAg screening is recommended in the antenatal care guidelines prepared by the Ministry of Health. Hepatitis B vaccine administration for all newborns started in 1998 and was included in the routine vaccination calendar in Turkey.

Although HBsAg seropositivity rates vary from region to region in our country, the average HBsAg positivity was found to be 4.4% (12). When the studies reported from different provinces are examined; similar rates were reported as 4.8% in Şanlıurfa (13), 5.7% in Rize (14), 4.7% in İstanbul (15) and 3.47% in Kırıkkale (16). Also, Çınar Tanrıverdi et al. (17) from Erzurum found the HBsAg positivity in their study was 1.2%, which is lower than other studies, while Kaleli et al. (18) from Denizli found a high rate of 7.6%. The population of our study consisted of patients who were followed up with a pregnancy-related diagnosis in the obstetrics and gynecology service and HBsAg positivity was found to be 2.1%. The study of Tüzüner et al. (19) from our university reported this rate as 2.81% in blood donors between 2013 and 2016.

HBV infection does not affect fertility unless there is advanced liver disease. However, it has not been clearly revealed how chronic hepatitis B infection affects pregnancy and the fetus. There are studies (20,21) suggesting that it increases the risk of GDM, abortion imminens, PTB, antepartum and pospartum hemorrhage, as well as studies suggesting the opposite (22). In a large cohort study conducted by Bajema et al. (23) in the United States of America in a low endemic region, they did not find a statistically significant relationship between hepatitis B infection and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Similarly in our study, when the case group and the control group were compared, no significant difference was found in terms of pregnancy outcomes.

In a cohort study conducted by Liu et al. (24) from China, it has been shown that the risk of PTB (odds ratio: 1.18) increases at a very low rate in HBsAg positive pregnant women. In the study conducted by Sirilert et al. (25) in Thailand the rate of premature birth was found to be statistically significantly higher in HBsAg and hepatitis B e antigen-positive patients. It was suggested that HBV-DNA triggers placental inflammation in relation to the amount of viral load, leading to premature birth (25). In our study, the abortion rate was 15.7% in the case group and 8.7% in the control group. While the rate of cases with the threat of PTB or premature rupture of membranes was 11.1% in the control group, this rate was 7.8% in the case group. Since our hospital is a tertiary unit, most of the patients consist of complicated patients. Therefore, the rate of patients diagnosed with PTB or premature rupture of membranes is high in the control group. In our study, no significant difference was found between the case group and the control group in terms of pregnancy outcomes.

In a study conducted in the USA, it was emphasized that depending on the conditions such as the chronicity of the infection, the degree of damage to the liver, comorbid conditions and access to health care, whether or not women are infected with HBV may change. It has been suggested that the findings revealed in the highly endemic region may not be valid for a country such as America where HBV infection is much less common (26). This may be due to the fact that our region is a low endemic region for hepatitis B. Studies to be conducted in different endemic regions of hepatitis B in our country will illuminate the effect of hepatitis B on pregnancy better.

Study Limitations

Retrospective nature of the present study and the inability to eliminate sub-standard prenatal care conditions that might have affected pregnancy outcomes were limitations.

Conclusion

In this study, no significant difference was found between the case group and the control group in terms of pregnancy outcomes. HBsAg positivity was found 2.1% in our study group. This rate is lower than other studies. Studies to be carried out in the high endemic region will better illuminate the effect of hepatitis B on pregnancy.

Ethics

Ethics Committee Approval: The study was approved by Ethics Committee Necmettin Erbakan University Meram Faculty of Medicine (approval number: 2021-126; date: 19.02.2021).

Informed Consent: Retrospective study.

Peer-review: Externally and internally peer-reviewed.

Authorship Contributions

Surgical and Medical Practices: F.K., Concept: Y.D.G., F.K., Design: Y.D.G., F.K., Data Collection or Processing: Y.D.G., F.K., Analysis or Interpretation: Y.D.G., F.E.T., Literature Search: Y.D.G., F.E.T., Writing: Y.D.G., F.E.T.

Conflict of Interest: No conflict of interest was declared by the authors.

Financial Disclosure: The authors declare no financial support.

References

Schädler S, Hildt E. HBV life cycle: entry and morphogenesis. Viruses. 2009;1:185-209.

Schweitzer A, Horn J, Mikolajczyk RT, Krause G, Ott JJ. Estimations of worldwide prevalence of chronic hepatitis B virus infection: a systematic review of data published between 1965 and 2013. Lancet. 2015;386:1546-1555.

Tozun N, Ozdogan O, Cakaloglu Y, Idilman R, Karasu Z, Akarca U, Kaymakoglu S, Ergonul O. Seroprevalance of hepatitis B and C virus infections and risk factors in Turkey: a fieldwork TURHEP study. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2015; 21:1020-1026.

Xu ZY, Liu CB, Francis DP, Purcell RH, Gun ZL, Duan SC, Chen RJ, Margolis HS, Huang CH, Maynard JE. Prevention of perinatal acquisition of hepatitis B virus carriage using vaccine: preliminary report of a randomized, double-blind placebo controlled and comparative trial. Pediatrics. 1985;76:713-718.

Özacar T. Hepatitis B Virus. In: Topçu AW, Söyletir G, Doğanay M, (eds). Infectious Diseases and Microbiology. İstanbul, Nobel Tıp Kitapevleri; 2008, p. 1882-1904.

Turkey Viral Hepatitis Diagnosis and Treatment Guide. (accessed on 23 October, 2020). https://www.vhsd.org

Reddick KL, Jhaveri R, Gandhi M, James AH, Swamy GK. Pregnancy outcomes associated with viral hepatitis. J Viral Hepat. 2011;18:e394-398.

Terrault NA, Bzowej NH, Chang KM, Hwang JP, Jonas MM, Murad MH. AASLD guidelines for treatment of chronic hepatitis B. Hepatology. 2016;63:261-283.

European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL clinical practice guidelines: Management of chronic hepatitis B virus infection. J Hepatol. 2012;57:167-185.

Sarin SK, Kumar M, Lau GK, Abbas Z, Chan HL, Chen CJ, Chen DS, Chen HL, Chen PJ, Chien RN, Dokmeci AK, Gane E, Hou JL, Jafri W, Jia J, Kim JH, Lai CL, Lee HC, Lim SG, Liu CJ, Locarnini S, Al Mahtab M, Mohamed R, Omata M, Park J, Piratvisuth T, Sharma BC, Sollano J, Wang FS, Wei L, Yuen MF, Zheng SS, Kao JH. Asian-Pacific clinical practice guidelines on the management of hepatitis B: a 2015 update. Hepatol Int. 2016;10:1-98.

Lao TT. Hepatitis B - chronic carrier status and pregnancy outcomes: An obstetric perspective. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2020;68:66-77.

Mıstık R, Balık İ. Epidemiological analysis of viral hepatitis in Turkey. In: Kılıçturgay K, Badur S, (eds). Viral Hepatit. İstanbul; 2001, p. 9-55.

Çopur Çiçek A, İnakçı İH, Duygu F. Hepatitis B and Hepatitis C Seropositivities in Women Admitted to Gynecology and Obstetrics Hospital in Şanlıurfa City: A 3-Year Evaluation. Viral Hepat J. 2012;18:15-18.

Balık G, Üstüner I, Kağıtcı M, Ural Mete Ü, Bayoğlu Tekin Y, Şentürk Ş, Güvendağ Güven ES, Kır Şahin F. HBsAg, AntiHBs and Anti-HCV seroprevalance in pregnant women in Rize region. Dicle Med J. 2013;40:254-257.

Karaca Ç, Karaca N, Usta T, Demir K, Kaymakoğlu S, Beşışık F, Sıdal B, Ökten A. The frequencies of Hepatitis B, C, D virus infection in the pregnant population and the rate of perinatal transmission of Hepatitis C virus. Turk J Acad Gastroenterol. 2003;2:122-124.

Dağ Özcan Z, Gül S, Işık Y, Tulmaç ÖB, Şimşek Y. Hepatitis B and Hepatitis C Seropositivity Rates in Pregnants who Live in Kırıkkale Region. Bozok Med J. 2015;5:1-4.

Çınar Tanrıverdi E, Özkurt Z, Göktuğ Kadıoğlu B, Alay H, Çalıkoğlu O, Koca Ö, Kamalak Z. Seroprevalence of hepatitis B, hepatitis C, and HIV in pregnant women from Eastern Turkey. Turk J Gastroenterol. 2019;30:260-265.

Kaleli B, Kaleli İ, Aktan E. HBsAg in and the cord blood of their infants. J Perinatolog. 1997;5:42-44.

Tüzüner U, Özdemir M, Feyzioğlu B, Baykan M. HCV, HIV and HBV Seroprevalence in Blood Donors of Necmettin Erbakan Üniversity, Meram Medical Faculty Hospital. Sakarya Med J. 2017;7:20-25.

Tse KY, Ho LF, Lao T. The impact of maternal HBsAg carrier status on pregnancy outcomes: a case-control study. J Hepatol. 2005;43:771-775.

Tan J, Liu X, Mao X, Yu J, Chen M, Li Y, Sun X. HBsAg positivity during pregnancy and adverse maternal outcomes: a retrospective cohort analysis. J Viral Hepat. 2016;23:812-819.

Connell LE, Salihu HM, Salemi JL, August EM, Weldeselasse H, Mbah AK. Maternal hepatitis B and hepatitis C carrier status and perinatal outcomes. Liver Int. 2011;31:1163-1170.

Bajema KL, Stankiewicz Karita HC, Tenforde MW, Hawes SE, Heffron R. Maternal Hepatitis B Infection and Pregnancy Outcomes in the United States: A Population-Based Cohort Study. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2018;5;ofy134.

Liu J, Zhang S, Liu M, Wang Q, Shen H, Zhang Y. Maternal pre-pregnancy infection with hepatitis B virus and the risk of preterm birth: a population-based cohort study. Lancet Glob Health. 2017;5:e624-e632.

Sirilert S, Traisrisilp K, Sirivatanapa P, Tongsong T. Pregnancy outcomes among chronic carriers of hepatitis B virus. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2014;126:106-110.

Shepard CW, Simard EP, Finelli L, Fiore AE, Bell BP. Hepatitis B virus infection: epidemiology and vaccination. Epidemiol Rev. 2006;28:112-125.

A Study of the Hepatitis B Frequency and Its Possible Adverse Outcomes on Pregnancy at a University Hospital